Tim Pawsat vs Brad Pearce Head to Head Stats

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Pawsat vs B. Pearce

Tim Pawsat

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

5'9" (175 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

223

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Brad Pearce

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

5'9" (175 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

223

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

Career Money

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-To-Head: Pawsat 1 - 1 Pearce

They have played 5 sets in total, with Tim Pawsat winning 2 and Brad Pearce winning 3. The last match between Brad Pearce and Tim Pawsat was at the Aptos CH, 25-07-1988, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Brad Pearce getting the victory 6-3 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Pawsat	1
Pearce	1

Last H2H Matches:

(F) Aptos CH(07-25-88)

Stats

Brad Pearce

Tim Pawsat

(R2) Tokyo Outdoor(04-11-88)

Stats

Tim Pawsat

Brad Pearce

T. Pawsat vs B. Pearce H2H Profile

T. Pawsat	Stats	B. Pearce
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
50.00% (16-16)	Career Total W/L	43.41% (79-103)
1	Hard	1
0	Titles	3
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

T. Pawsat vs B. Pearce Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tim Pawsat has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Brad Pearce has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tim Pawsat, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Brad Pearce has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Tim Pawsat has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Brad Pearce has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Tim Pawsat has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Brad Pearce winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Tim Pawsat has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 13/ 13). Brad Pearce has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7).
Player level: In the last year, Tim Pawsat has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0), where as Brad Pearce has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Tim Pawsat winning 1 times and Brad Pearce being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Tim Pawsat winning 2 and Brad Pearce winning 3. The last match between Brad Pearce and Tim Pawsat was at the Aptos CH, 25-07-1988, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Brad Pearce getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tim Pawsat has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Brad Pearce has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tim Pawsat has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Brad Pearce has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Tim Pawsat has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Brad Pearce has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Tim Pawsat vs Brad Pearce Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Pawsat vs B. Pearce H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. Pawsat	Stats	B. Pearce
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	3
23	Games Won	25
0:0:0	Avg. Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won → Match Won	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

T. Pawsat Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Livingston - 07-08-1989
R3 Paul AnnaconeP. Annacone	L	4-6 7-6 6-4	Stats
Nagoya CH - 26-04-1989
R3 David LewisD. Lewis	W	6-3 6-7 6-4	Stats
R4 Jeremy BatesJ. Bates	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Guangzhou CH - 09-11-1988
R3 Joseph RussellJ. Russell	W	4-6 6-1 6-4	Stats
R4 Richard WhichelloR. Whichello	L	6-7 6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

B. Pearce Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Challenger Ciudad de Tijuana - Tijuana - 03-08-1998
R1 Tetsuya ChaenT. Chaen	W	7-6(4) 2-6 6-4	Stats
R2 Scott HumphriesS. Humphries	L	6-3 3-6 7-5	Stats
1998 Safeway Challenger - Aptos - 13-07-1998
R1 Adam PetersonA. Peterson	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Oahu - 03-01-1994
R1 Brad GilbertB. Gilbert	L	4-6 6-4 7-5	Stats
Washington - 19-07-1993
R1 Mauricio HadadM. Hadad	L	1-6 6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

T. Pawsat vs B. Pearce Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. Pawsat	Stats	B. Pearce
50.00% (16/16)	YTD Win/Loss	43.41% (79/103)
46.05% (35/41)	Sets Win/Loss	45.96% (205/241)
48.43% (354/377)	Games Win/Loss	48.26% (2052/2200)
50.00% (13/13)	Hard Win/Loss	42.24% (49/67)
0% (0/0)	Clay Win/Loss	36.36% (4/7)
0.00% (0/1)	Indoor Hard W/L	47.37% (18/20)
60.00% (3/2)	Grass Win/Loss	47.06% (8/9)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
367.63	Average Opponent Rank	256.82
0% (0/0)	Slam W/L	38.46% (5/8)
50.00% (1/1)	Masters W/L	26.67% (4/11)
25.00% (2/6)	Main Tour W/L	34.78% (32/60)
59.09% (13/9)	Challenger W/L	61.29% (38/24)
50% (16/32)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	44% (73/166)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	33% (5/15)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	80% (8/10)
75% (9/12)	Deciding Set Win %	39% (23/59)
87% (15/13)	1st Set Won, Won Match	76% (90/68)
13% (15/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	24% (90/22)
18% (17/3)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	12% (92/11)